April 2022 – Not guilty!
Another brilliant result for a client who was acquitted of both s.18 and attempted murder. Thanks go to Daniel Jameson of Garden court chambers instructed by Sandra Riordan of Powell Spencer and Partners, an excellent team!
Metro Blind Sport Annual Athletics Open 2022 Appeal
We are so pleased to support Metro Blind Sport’s Annual Athletics Open on the 11 June 2022. A great organisation we have now been supporting for over a decade!
Metro Blind Sport – https://www.metroblindsport.org/
Double Acquittal
A brilliant result in Isleworth Crown Court and enormous thanks to Ollie Renton and Alex Monaghan of Crucible Chambers .
Greg Powell acted for a hotel owner and his wife who were accused of being involved with a gang supplying drugs using
a hotel room as their base . As a result of vigorous representations the Crown offered no evidence against the owner on the first day of Trial .
His wife was then acquitted by the unanimous verdict of the Jury after 5 days of trial . A family who had been through the most stressful time of their lives enormously relieved which is what makes the work of a Criminal defence lawyer worthwhile.
Oliver Renton – https://crucible.law/people/oliver-renton
Alex Monaghan – https://crucible.law/people/alexandra-monaghan
Greg Powell – https://psplaw.co.uk/team/greg-powell
NFA
Often the best result is when police conclude that there are good reasons for closing the investigation and tell the client there will be NO Further Action .
Our client was delighted today to hear that news after attending a voluntary police interview under caution with Greg Powell regarding an assault .
A very happy family !
Greg Powell – https://psplaw.co.uk/team/greg-powell
Man acquitted of serious firearms offences after gang evidence excluded and DNA evidence undermined
The CPS failed to rely upon gang evidence to support their case against a client of Mark Troman in a trial before Harrow Crown Court this month. The application related to the lyrics and movie footage used in a number of drill track recorded years before. The judge was not persuaded to admit the evidence following details and robust opposition from the defence. Further, the DNA evidence allegedly linking the man to a firearms was undermined by defence expert examination and interrogation of the scenes of crime reports and forensic analysis.